Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Kundalini, even more thoughts

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 17:04:38 Dharma wrote:

>Yes! They are part of the character... and the costumes and make-up etc.,

>etc.

 

What happens when you take all the costumes

and the make up off from the actor ?

>This play might end. :)

 

I do hope so. I'm tired of being a jester

stumbling around out there among the props

and getting

the occasional sand bag in the head. ;)

>To me it seems that I am the energy at the axis of all the bodies... or I

>am the focal point of consciousness... a moving point...

 

That's a great perception and one I

agree with holeheartedly.

That each person is a localized movable

field of consciousness in the large whole.

:)

>Teilhard de Chardin, who was a scientist as well as a Jesuit, said that all

>matter, every atom, has a two-fold nature... consciousness (or spirit)

>The consciousness of a small bit of matter is not the

>same, of course, as the consciousness in a more complex aggregate of matter

>and therefore of consciousness.

he had to

>invent some new words to say what he wanted to say. :)

 

:) I can believe that.

An interesting combination, physicist and

Jesuit. :)

Consciousness is unliving matter is a

strange issue indeed, but there seems to be

a consciousness permeating everything,

was /has been very odd and quite surprising.

I'll post more about that later on.

>Nothing to fear... Death + rebirth = transformation.

 

:))

Isn't that what the card of Death

and the hanged man in Tarot

represents as well ?

>Did you notice that someone recently referred to me as "he"? Doesn't

>matter... I may have been speaking through my male side in the last post

>he read. :)

 

LOL ! Yes you must have.

Good thing you don't fear that kind

of online confusion.

>I think many of us, maybe all of us, are learning during sleep... it's

>just that most don't remember the night-time "class.".

>I think there are some things that are easier to learn when we're farther

>away from "normal" consciousness... seems that the more our experience is

>different from anything we know, the harder it is to remember.

 

Your words reflect my thoughts in these

matters. It wasn't my intention in making

it sound like something very exclusive.

The devaloka is for everybody. :)

 

Thanks again for sharing your experience

and thoughts with us.

 

Love,

 

Amanda.

 

 

 

 

Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Amanda,

>What happens when you take all the costumes

>and the make up off from the actor ?

>

>>This play might end. :)

>

>I do hope so. I'm tired of being a jester

>stumbling around out there among the props

>and getting

>the occasional sand bag in the head. ;)

 

You sound a bit depressed... I was being facetious, but... You can always

take a little vacation... get off-stage for a while and watch the action

going on... (being the witness, they call it). Or switch your

character... I'm sure you're not a jester all the time. :))

 

Professional actors have fun, I think... they get to play all sorts of

parts, even the kind of parts they would never take in real life. :))

 

For one kind of vacation, you could try out a different character on the

net. In a chat-room you can be anybody you want to be... with a different

email address. If you don't like to feel that you're fooling someone, then

don't... just say, "I'm trying on a new persona today. I hope you don't

mind." Lots of people wouldn't mind at all... they'd think it was fun.

:)))

>>To me it seems that I am the energy at the axis of all the bodies... or I

>>am the focal point of consciousness... a moving point...

>

>That's a great perception and one I

>agree with holeheartedly.

 

Does that typo - "holeheartedly" - mean anything to you? I just point it

out because very often when I do that, if I think about it, I can see that

it's meaningful, usually a message from my guide.

>That each person is a localized movable

>field of consciousness in the large whole.

>:)

 

Yes, true. But I actually meant a focal _point_. Take the field of

vision... there are so many things within my vision. Some things I see

better with the peripheral vision, but it's not extremely sharp and clear.

It's the clearest right at the focal point. Consciousness seems like that

to me... most intense and vital right at the focal point. And I, the

point, can move from one field to another... wherever I am is the focal

point. If it's above the level of intellectual mind, I may not be

conscious in an intellectual thinking way... and that's okay, that's not

all of it... I don't want to be there all the time. You don't have to be

intellectual, you don't have to be thinking to be conscious. That's only

the third plane anyway...

>>Teilhard de Chardin, who was a scientist as well as a Jesuit, said that all

>>matter, every atom, has a two-fold nature... consciousness (or spirit)

>>The consciousness of a small bit of matter is not the

>>same, of course, as the consciousness in a more complex aggregate of matter

>>and therefore of consciousness.

>he had to

>>invent some new words to say what he wanted to say. :)

>

>:) I can believe that.

>An interesting combination, physicist and

>Jesuit. :)

 

Actually, he was a paleontologist and geologist... one of the team that

discovered Peking man.

>Consciousness is unliving matter is a

>strange issue indeed, but there seems to be

>a consciousness permeating everything,

>was /has been very odd and quite surprising.

>I'll post more about that later on.

 

I'll be interested in that. :)

 

Love,

Dharma

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> >Amanda:

> >Consciousness is unliving matter is a

> >strange issue indeed, but there seems to be

> >a consciousness permeating everything,

> >was /has been very odd and quite surprising.

> >I'll post more about that later on.

 

Since all is one... just being... it is obvious to me

that there is conciousness even in matter that humans would

qualify as unliving. I presume this is obvious to others?

 

Curious,

Love

Annie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...