Guest guest Posted April 2, 2000 Report Share Posted April 2, 2000 In a message dated 4/2/00 12:25:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, aoclery writes: << K rising can happen imperceptibly,as with japa, realisation in some people doesn't require the experiences of cleansing prana. K doesn't really rise it manifests in different vortices/chakras that's all. It would be better if all could achieve moksha without any experience at all. If one continues with meat eating, drinking alcohol, bad company, thoughts etc, one will continue to experience cleansing prana, but it is nothing to be proud of or revel in. It is like saying I am still impure, lucky me. It is attachment to experiencing and is binding. Oh if we could achieve the Heart Centre without any experience at all!! Om Namah Sivaya, Tony. >> Tony, l feel that in some respects your comments are simplistic and misleading, as is so often the case in commentary about k. lt's true that in some cases k appears to manifest in certain chakras rather than to rise. lt's equally true that in many cases k definitely does rise. l think it may also be true that in many cases k doesn't require what appears to be the cleansing action of prana and manifests in a more trouble-free way, but exactly why this occurs is by no means clear. l for one have not eaten meat, drunk alcohol, had sex, kept bad company, etc and l submit that my thoughts are no more impure than most k people l've come across --- yet, l've had a 7-1/2 yr struggle with k that continues. l don't know why this is so, and l don't believe that you or other so called "experts" do either. There are many imponderable factors that could be involved that are simply unknown. l'm sure l am like many others who have unexpectedly found themselves in this extremely difficult situation. Of course there is suffering, and one's emotions run the gamut, including even the ones you've mentioned. But overwhelmingly, what has developed for me are feelings of increased depth, compassion, humor, gratitude and hope. ln the context of what l'm experiencing, l can only say that your comments - about reveling and feeling proud of this - sound trivial. One doesn't revel in, or feel proud of such experiences, but rather hopefully goes through stages of accomodation, acceptance and gratitude in a painful learning and growing process. You speak of the desirability of achieving the heart centre without experience. My own sense is that this sort of thing may be at least partly why so many teachers like your friend Sai Baba fall: they experience k and other spiritual realizations of some kind, but their spiritual realizations are not sufficiently grounded in the type of life experiences that would have taught them lessons they badly needed to learn before flaunting their knowledge and power before the world. One doesn't need to glorify suffering in order to recognize that it can teach humility, understanding and compassion - qualities that too few teachers have embodied. jerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2000 Report Share Posted April 2, 2000 Namaste All, K rising can happen imperceptibly,as with japa, realisation in some people doesn't require the experiences of cleansing prana. K doesn't really rise it manifests in different vortices/chakras that's all. It would be better if all could achieve moksha without any experience at all. If one continues with meat eating, drinking alcohol, bad company, thoughts etc, one will continue to experience cleansing prana, but it is nothing to be proud of or revel in. It is like saying I am still impure, lucky me. It is attachment to experiencing and is binding. Oh if we could achieve the Heart Centre without any experience at all!! Om Namah Sivaya, Tony. ===== http://members.xoom.com/aoclery/sanskritglos.htm ASATHO MA SATH GAMAYA, From the unreal lead me to the real, THAMASO MA JYOTHIR GAMAYA, From darkness, lead me to light, MRITHYOR MA AMRITAM GAMAYA.From death, lead me to immortality. OM, SHANTI SHANTI SHANTI. Om, Peace Peace Peace. Talk to your friends online with Messenger. http://im. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2000 Report Share Posted April 3, 2000 Jerry wrote: <l'm sure l am like many others who have unexpectedly found <themselves in this extremely difficult situation. Of course there is <suffering, and one's emotions run the gamut> <One doesn't revel in, or feel proud of such experiences, but rather <hopefully goes through stages of accomodation, acceptance and gratitude in a <painful learning and growing process.> Jerry, thanks for spelling this out once again - kundalini rising can be the origin of so many different health-related problems and I think it's pretty futile to try to squeeze this phenomenon into rigid and moralistic categories of purity and impurity. I'm sure there's a certain karmic connection but, as you said, there are also so many unknown parameters involved. I sometimes have the feeling the universe or God or whatever you may want to call it, wants to get us to a certain point and maybe suffering and pain is just a shortcut to that state of being - however unpleasant the road there might be. Possibly the only thing that really works is surrender and at the same time it's the most difficult thing to do (for me at least:)). I also sometimes ask myself, maybe it's the very act of surrender the universe wants to produce ? As for the question whether kundalini actually rises or only manifests in the chakras or whether it only rises when there are impurities to be taken care of, I can only draw on my own experience. What I've seen in myself is that there's a very evident rising motion, going from the bottom of the spine upward to the brain. This is strongest when I'm actually in a "pure" state, i.e after having performed sadhana, meditation, asanas, pranayama etc. I've on occassion actually also eaten meat, drunk wine and in general committed all sorts of abominable acts, and here the activity of the shakti has usually become dulled and sluggish. This seems to somewhat contradict Tony's assessement of the why and how of kundalini-movement, but it's probably true that there are no definite rules and that everybody needs to find these things out for themselves. All the best, Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2000 Report Share Posted April 3, 2000 Michael wrote: As for the question whether kundalini actually rises or only manifests in the chakras or whether it only rises when there are impurities to be taken care of, I can only draw on my own experience. What I've seen in myself is that there's a very evident rising motion, going from the bottom of the spine upward to the brain. This is strongest when I'm actually in a "pure" state, i.e after having performed sadhana, meditation, asanas, pranayama etc. I've on occassion actually also eaten meat, drunk wine and in general committed all sorts of abominable acts, and here the activity of the shakti has usually become dulled and sluggish. This seems to somewhat contradict Tony's assessement of the why and how of kundalini-movement, but it's probably true that there are no definite rules and that everybody needs to find these things out for themselves. All the best, Michael Hi Michael. I am a long term vegetarian, and currently about 98% vegan but try not to be too rigid. Sometimes I eat Indian sweets or cheese cake if the social occasion demands it or if I am forced to do it. But heavy foods leave me feeling heavy. So I prefer mangoes to Pizza and ice cream. I use soymilk as a substitute for milk in my tea. During the summer, if I have the opportunity, I go on a raw (fruits, vegetables) diet for some days. Food does affect the manifestation of Shakti. In my 20s for a short time, I experimented with eating Red Kidney Beans, fried in butter, with a little bit of wine (half a cup or so) as prescribed for vegetarian tantrics. The effect on my body was huge and I would quickly enter celestial states after that. However, most people fall asleep after a big meal of Red Kidney Beans. The difference is in the change of the internal system. My experience was that Kundalini awakens from the bottom of the spine (also from the bottom of the feet in certain situations), breaks the granthis and goes to Sahasarara. After that process is completed, one can focus on any center (Back and Front) and make the Shakti rise from that and experience the power and nature of that center. Ultimately all centers are left behind and one enters That, merging oneself in That. Instantaneously emerges That It Self and One Sees that That Is Me, not essentially different from me, gives life to me, and has always been Present. Love Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.