Kundalini yet again, was: Tony Syndrome

[Guest guest]

Thank you Maureen and Wim for your comments.

Always interesting to read what you have to say.

 

On Fri, 28 Apr 2000 22:13:53 Maureen Heffernan wrote:

>Wim wrote:

>> but my God that is all from books!

>> and amongst other things it is all:

>> ..............................gobbledegook..........>> Get to work, real

work!

>

>~~*+M~*

>star suddenly appear.... Interesting. I have ^seen^ much.

 

> I have read much and studied about Kundalini and it being the sexual

>energy. Seems always to revolve around that.Much of the experiences I

>read about on list, I too have experienced,,,,and more,,, and yet I am

>celibate for many years. Confusing. Dr. Glen writes that if it isn't

>dynamic it didn't happen. Confusing.Mine was more gentle.

 

This makes me wonder: What is dynamism ?

 

To me, dynamism is what Kundalini Shakti is all about.

Sometimes all I see is dynamism and movement all around.

However, this is

in the mind, since as Harsha has pointed out,

Kundalini Shakti is the mind.

To me it feels as if this mind is a mass mind and

recognizes itself in everything,

including that which is at first thought to be separate.

It is looking back upon itself and knowing itself as the energy, the force.

 

Dr. Glen has somewhat narrow views on what constitutes

a "Kundalini awakening" as he calls it,

with an emphasis on experience and not that which

experiences, yet in the

question on dynamism, I do share some of his views.

However, lack of dynamism does not equal lack of

energy. The basic consciousness remains Kundalini

Shakti or not.

 

And there is the question of sublimation

of sexuality and

the sublimation of the concept of sexuality.

What is sexuality ? How is it conceptually and

experientially different from other kinds

of experiences ?

Yet, on the subject of sexuality and the

norm concepts of it,

I have found connections b/n certain chakras.

>I think this is what Tony is going after. I

>know I haven't read enough but there's a whole other portion of material

>on Kundalini that doesn't appear to be represented on some of the lists

>I read.And it is ,,*in the books*.

 

Experiences are one thing, I have been a proponent

or rather a conduit, for experience myself,

so not a bad word about experience...

however, I have a hunch also

there are aspects of the Kundalini Shakti

that are not mentioned on the lists.

 

Kundalini-Shakti is to me

pure consciusness penetrating

the mind body and literally turning everything

on, turning it into an all seeing Eye that

never closes, meaning that all sensory information

and all that the mind turns its attention towards

will be perceived as in and of itself, the I.

 

I too try to keep an ear to the ground and

listen to the Irishman as I feel he has something

to tell us.

 

Thanks for letting me ramble a little tonight.

 

Love,

 

Amanda.

 

 

 

 

Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com